This post is a follow-up to my previous post, where I discuss why I don't like Social Impact Bonds. Today, Sunday, there was a short tv
debate shown in New Zealand about using Social Impact Bonds to address mental health problems. My name is invoked at the five-minute mark. I would say that both protagonists are not quite correct. I'm against these SIBs only because they are not
tradeable, because then there won't be much of the (necessary) innovation that
the pro-SIB man, Stephen Franks, was talking about.
No comments:
Post a Comment